Saturday, December 02, 2006
Tuesday, January 24, 2006
Coerced Update
I do not understand why some professors, more so than the lesser-educated populace, accept either some or all the tenants of Post-Modernism. I also do not understand why departments choose to hire such people either. Or why there are journals, that are purchased by institutions of higher-learning, that publish such material. A sample of the great work by a post-modernist philosopher by the name of Jean Baudrillard:
On a personal note, it seems to make the most sense to not bother yourself such situations: if you are interested in another person, reveal this fact of the world, and they either do not reciprocate or have no reaction. Worrying over things that you are entirely powerless to control or remotely influence is rather pointless. Additionally, emotion does seem to rely on perception or personal acknowledgment. If this is the case then one can always ignore the physiological signals sent to your consciousness. An optimal situation for everyone.
"Shortly before the Gulf War, Baudrillard predicted that the war would not actually happen. After the war, he claimed that he had been correct, that no war had taken place. The reality of the war, where people fight for a cause and are killed, had been replaced by a 'copy' war that is delivered to televisions across the world where no fighting is taking place."Now I know it isn't just me, but this makes absolutely no sense. If Mr. Baudrillard wants to argue over what the word "war" means, then fine, there are plenty of pot-smokers that would gladly engage you. But if he wants to be taken seriously, then how can he make such a claim. Imbedded in the word "war" is no pretense of "reality" or "authenticity". The wars that take place between GI Joe and Cobra in comic books are wars. Now they do not exist in reality, and no they do not have their own reality. As Bertrand Russell said:
"Similarly, to maintain that Hamlet, for example, exists in his own world, namely, in the world of Shakespeare's imagination, just as truly as (say) Napolean (sic) existed in the ordinary world, is to say something deliberately confusing, or else confused to a degree which is scarely credible...If no one thought about Hamlet, there would be nothing left of him; if no one had thought about Napolean (sic), he would have soon seen to it that some one did." (Descriptions).This seems to be true. It seems that people who engage in the language games that are continental philosophy/post-modernism/etc are being intellectually dishonest and fradulant in the sense of achieving any sort of academic rigor. Sure, there many very well be limits to rationality, but they are not going to be discovered by people claiming such things and positing a limited picture of reality.
On a personal note, it seems to make the most sense to not bother yourself such situations: if you are interested in another person, reveal this fact of the world, and they either do not reciprocate or have no reaction. Worrying over things that you are entirely powerless to control or remotely influence is rather pointless. Additionally, emotion does seem to rely on perception or personal acknowledgment. If this is the case then one can always ignore the physiological signals sent to your consciousness. An optimal situation for everyone.
Friday, December 09, 2005
the Declaration of Independence (United States)
The Declaration of Independence, you know, the document American school-children are indoctrinated to idolize? Well, as I was passively watching a program on the Declaration of Independence on the History Channel and it made the claim Mr. Thomas Jefferson penned the piece during a two-week span. I was struck. Two weeks? How in the hell did it take two weeks to pen this document? According to the copy at the Indiana University School of Law has 1,350 words in it (roughly 2 ½ pages of single space text). I know I've been at college too long, but 2 weeks to pen 1,350 words is ludicrous. I know it is a beautifully worded, but two-weeks to write it (along with less than 2 weeks of revision at the Continental Congress). Give a normal college student 3 or 4 Redbull's, some sources (like the Virginia Declaration of Rights, Thomas Paine's Common Sense, and such), and he'll knock this out in no time. An associate, Doug Sparrow to be precise, is at the UL penning a 25 page paper on politics in Sub-Saharan Africa right now. Rubbish. We need to stop worshipping these lazy mofos who were our forefathers. Regardless, I just needed to write some text down here. Mr. Douglass has been harassing me over my neglect for this blog. Peace.







